ImageCast X application Versions 5.5.10.30 and 5.5.10.32, as used in Dominion Democracy Suite Voting System Version 5.5-A.ImageCast X firmware based on Android 5.1, as used in Dominion Democracy Suite Voting System Version 5.5-A.The following versions of the Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X software are known to be affected (other versions were not able to be tested): Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.Įxploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. Read more information on Post Election Reviews.This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. In the audit, votes for certain offices are counted by hand, and that total is compared with the machine-counted results from election night. Post-Election ReviewsĪfter each state general election, counties randomly draw a set of precincts where they audit the results from the ballot tabulators. Public Accuracy Tests are open to the public-contact your local election official to find the time and location of their next scheduled test. Some equipment is also tested at a Public Accuracy Test shortly before the election. For the preliminary testing, ballots are marked with assistive voting devices, a set of pre-marked ballots is fed into the ballot tabulators, and the machine's totals are compared with the pre-determined results. Pre-Election Testingīefore every election, local election officials test all equipment to be used in that election. Election Assistance Commission and undergo detailed additional testing by the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State. Certificationīefore being certified for use in Minnesota, all voting equipment must be tested and certified by test labs accredited by the U.S. Equipment is approved by the state, tested locally before elections, and the results audited after elections. Minnesota election administrators use a number of procedures to ensure equipment will accurately record valid votes. Only one kind of electronic pollbook is used currently: Electronic pollbooks are used to check in registered voters and also to assist in the election day registration process. Some polling places in Minnesota use electronic pollbooks (also known as ePollbooks) instead of paper rosters. This equipment includes:Īdditional information about this equipment and its capabilities is on the Ballot Marking Machine webpage. They are separate pieces of equipment from the tabulators, and do not actually tally votes but merely help a voter mark an optical scan ballot. Assistive voting devices fulfill this role. With a few exceptions, federal law requires that all polling places must have equipment which allows private and independent voting for voters with disabilities. View a map of ballot tabulators used in the 2022 general election. In addition, some precincts in the state are still counted by hand. Other tabulators have been used in the past. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |